Reblogged
from Vox Political:
“A bank in the UK could lend, say, $1bn to a US bank… generating tax-free
income in the UK but a tax deduction in the US – and then simply borrow it back.
For the second leg a different instrument could be used that generated tax-free
income in the US and a tax deduction in the UK. The banks had simply swapped
$1bn, to no economic effect beyond two tax breaks, while quite possibly keeping
any mention of the debts off either’s balance sheet. Such tricks – the creation
of debt more for tax advantages than any real business need – undoubtedly
contributed to huge levels of inter-bank indebtedness that triggered the
financial crisis.” – Richard Brooks, The Great Tax
Robbery, p86.
If you are not deeply disturbed by the implications of the above quotation,
read it again until you are. Richard Brooks is saying that the major banks of
the UK, the USA, and who knows how many other countries colluded to hide massive
amounts of money from the tax man by claiming – falsely – that it was debt.
The financial crisis happened because the banks could not service the debt
they had created – they could not even pay back the interest on it, let alone
the debt itself – and so the government was forced to step in and bail them out.
So now the government had not only lost the tax it was due from the bank profits
that had been hidden by the dodge Mr Brooks mentions, but it had now taken on
the fake debt that had been created. The taxpayer was doubly the
loser.
Who pays back the debt? Not the banks. Not the large corporations that are
also avoiding tax. Not the rich businessmen and women who dreamed up the tax
dodges. Thanks to changes in the law and already-existing legal loopholes that
have not been closed by the Coalition government, they have been able to park
their ill-gotten gains in offshore tax havens, depriving the nation of the
wherewithal it needs to fix the problem they created.
Now it seems the government is also being deprived of badly-needed tax money
because of the way large firms are structuring their pay packets – to the
disadvantage of low-paid workers. The details were in Channel 4′s
Dispatches documentary, Secrets of Your Pay
Packet, broadcast on October 21.
With more people in work than ever before, the UK should be getting massive
amounts more in tax and National Insurance, allowing it to provide the services
we expect and pay down the national deficit. But the deficit
hasn’t budged. Why?
Because the new jobs are part-time, self-employed or
temporary.
Self-employed contracting means you can end up working for less than
the minimum wage (you’re paid a fixed daily rate for the job, not the
hours it takes to do it, so if it takes a long time to get it done, your
pay-per-hour diminishes proportionately – and, as you are self-employed, you’re
not entitled to the minimum wage).
Conversely, if you are employed part-time, you can end up working too
few hours to qualify for tax or National Insurance (so you don’t get
enough credits to pay for your pension later in life and the Treasury doesn’t
get the tax money it needs to pay for services and clear debts) and on a
personal level you don’t work enough hours to qualify for decent holidays. The
company doesn’t pay for employees going on annual leave, potentially saving tens
of millions of pounds.
If you work overtime, this doesn’t count towards annual leave, of course. So
you can be employed on a part-time contract for, say, three days a week, be
asked to work two more days overtime (a full five-day week) and lose out on all
the benefits a full-time worker would expect.
The threshold is 20 hours per week. If you work less than that, employers do
not have to pay NI contributions which would cost them nearly 14 per cent of
pay. So people may work all their lives but never qualify for the state
pension.
This is why more people are now in work than before the recession –
it’s a cheat by bosses. They’re the ones who pay your tax and
NI contributions. If you’re on pay that’s below the new tax threshold, you don’t
pay tax. We have the Liberal Democrats to thank for that. It seems like
a good deal but in fact it isn’t.
Meanwhile the companies say that cutting down working hours has saved jobs in
a hard business environment, while the number of full-time jobs is down and
wages have now fallen by 12 per cent in real terms (up from nine per cent, only
a few months ago).
It is cheaper for companies to employ more people on shorter hours
because they pay less to the government in tax and NI. And they say the
“flexible” labour market has been a boost for the country, that having a job is
better than having no job, and that it will help people progress.
That is not what we see.
We see a workforce ground down by the pressure of making ends meet on
part-time or zero-hours jobs, making no NI contributions, getting very few
holidays, and afraid to challenge the situation because their employers can
simply let them go and hire someone else from the huge 2.5-million-strong pool
of the unemployed (who are desperate for jobs because the DWP fills their entire
lives will bullying and threats about losing their benefits).
We see the government completely unable to cover its costs because its own
tax system – written by the ‘Big 4′ accountancy firms that have been responsible
for more tax avoidance schemes than any other organisations in the country –
actively promotes corporate tax avoidance; and Conservative ministers are
totally indifferent to the huge losses they are piling up, because it means they
can cut public services, or sell them off to (again) big corporations who will
then avoid paying tax on them.
And we see the rich corporates laughing all the way to the (offshore)
bank yet again.
The Coalition government has tried to tell us that it must squeeze benefits
for the extremely poor, and low-paid working people must work much harder, in
order to pay off the debt that – no matter what ministers tell us – neither
they, nor the last Labour government, created.
In fact, this has been a story of tax avoidance by the very rich. A huge
scam, running for decades, and hidden from the British people.
Are you angry yet?