This is a very short little story indeed but it is just too, too, delicious to
not give it airtime. The UK has decided that all ISPs must deploy opt-in
pornography filters: so that children are not by chance or mishap exposed to
“legal hardcore porn” in the words of the Prime Minister, David Cameron. This
is, as you are obviously aware, as a result of a campaign by the usual suspects
to insist that teenage boys looking at naked people is going to bring about the
very fall of our civilisation.
What the campaign and the campaigners
forget of course is that the internet tends to route around censorship. So it
only took 24 hours for a Chrome extension to be released that entirely bypasses
all such filters. And they also were unaware that creating an effective filter
is actually quite difficult. You can’t just block every site that includes the
words “sex”, or “porn” or “rape” because there are many sites that use such
words but which are not pornography. Which leads to this:
But the changes
have led to internet users being denied access to a wide range of organisations
including child protection charities, women’s charities and gay rights groups.
Among institutions that have found themselves subject to the blocks are the
British Library and the National Library of Scotland.
The opt-in filters
also deny access to the Parliament and Government websites and the sites of
politicians, including Claire Perry, the MP who has campaigned prominently for
the introduction of filters.
Given what they do with our money I suppose
you can indeed decide that Parliament and the Government are forms of
pornography. But it’s that blocking of Claire Perry’s site that is just so
joyous. For of course the blocking has come as a result of her using that very
same site to campaign in favour of the filtering. Leading to her site having a
heavy usage of the words “porn”, “sex” and the like and thus being taken to be
itself pornographic.
And I think that’s a much better joke than anything
I’m likely to see in the cracker later today.
