Saturday, April 20, 2013

BBC radio presenter wins tribunal after DWP wrongly claimed she was fit to work despite recovering from chemotherapy and double mastectomy

  • Despite her breast cancer ordeal the DWP cut Val Armstrong's weekly cash

  • BBC Cumbria DJ had 2 years off after chemotherapy and losing both breasts

  • 'When I was battling to get back to health, hurdles were put in my way'

  • Val is now back at work but says legal fight was a matter of principle

A BBC radio star has beaten the Government in a tribunal after they wrongly claimed she was fit to work as she recovered from intensive chemotherapy and losing both breasts.
 
Val Armstrong, of Carlisle, Cumbria, challenged the Department For Work and Pensions (DWP) after they unfairly cut her benefit.
 

The 48-year-old was diagnosed with breast cancer for the second time in August 2010 and as a result underwent a double mastectomy.
 
In pain from chemotherapy, the BBC Cumbria presenter was off work sick for two years and also suffered from insomnia.
 
 
 article-2311635-19629C41000005DC-159_306x423article-2311635-19629C49000005DC-602_306x423
 Unwell: Radio presenter Val Armstrong was recovering from chemotherapy and cancer surgery when the Government unfairly cut her benefit. She is now healthy and back working at BBC Cumbria
 

 
With an active sick note, the DWP allowed her to claim contribution based employment support allowance but put her into a work related activity group for people who they feel are able to return to work.
 
In March 2012 Val had to undergo a work capability assessment. During this medical she was awarded points according to her condition.
 
Val needed to accumulate 15 points to continue to receive employment support however she was awarded 0 points.
 
In April 2012 the DWP deemed her fit for work and were to stop her benefit unless she appealed.
 
Val who has worked for the BBC for 31 years, said: ‘My wage had stopped and my £96 a week was cut to £71 per week. I wasn’t getting much to start with and of course this caused financial stress.
 
'I was lucky that I had put money aside and I had family who could help me financially but not everybody has family who can help them.
 
'At a time when I was battling to try to get back to full health, hurdles and obstacles were put in my way which made it very difficult.
 
In March 2012 Val had to undergo a work capability assessment. During this medical she was awarded points according to her condition.
Val needed to accumulate 15 points to continue to receive employment support however she was awarded 0 points.
 
In April 2012 the DWP then deemed her fit for work and were to stop her benefit unless she appealed.
 
Response: The DWP say that all Britons are able to appeal decisions, which they say are based on medical evidence
Response: The DWP say that all Britons are able to appeal decisions, which they say are based on medical evidence
Val teamed up with her Macmillan Cancer Support adviser to lodge one, as she knew she would struggle financially, especially as she cared for her mother.
 
Six months later she received a phone call from civil servants saying she still did not have enough points for the full benefit.
  

But after doing her homework Val soon found a regulation which stated that DWP hadn't followed their own rules.
  

She then took the DWP to a tribunal on April 3, 2013 which she won, and will now receive a back payment, and has returned to work.
 
She said: 'I am hoping that the people who genuinely feel that they have a case will find their voice and will take it all the way.
 
'I'm not fazed by the system and I know some people are but I totally believe that if people are being treated wrongly they they should take it all the way.'
 
A DWP spokesperson said: 'A decision on whether someone is well enough to work is taken after consideration of all the supporting medical evidence provided by the claimant, but everybody has the right to appeal a decision if they disagree with it'.