Monday, October 7, 2013

Dacre should resign, or if he lacks the integrity to do so, he should be sacked by Rothermere

Reblogged from Michael Meacher MP:


The real issue raised by the Mail-Miliband saga is the accountability of the press.   Who is to hold journalists/editors/proprietors to account when they blatantly misbehave?   Of course everyone is in favour of freedom of the press, but freedom in this context (or indeed in any situation) does not mean unconstrained licence.   As always where there are rights, they come with responsibilities.   But in today’s Britain where accountability is at its lowest ebb for decades, who is to exercise that proper restraining influence?   Certainly not the Press Complaints Commission, a broken reed if ever there was one.   It must be one of the bitterest of ironies that the man who, as chair of the editors’ code of practice committee, is responsible within the industry for the ethics of the press is none other than the man who has so brazenly trashed the rules of conduct with utter contempt.  Dacre has compounded his offence by turning down flat any idea of apology, reprinting the original offensive article, and overseeing a culture at the Mail so vindictive that it can seek to vilify a political leader by grossly mispresenting his father’s views – as though his father’s views, whatever they were, have the slightest relevance.

What redoubles the bitter irony of this situation is that Dacre, who will go to the last ditch in defence of press self-regulation, will now in the next week be trying with every device at his disposal to repudiate Leveson in the name of press freedom, a principle that he has himself irreversibly tarnished.   How can a man retain his position as upholder of the morality of an industry when he himself has so flagrantly abused it?   If any one in politics had behaved with the same unpardonable misconduct as he has shown, Dacre would be the first to be screaming for their resignation.   He should now play by his own rules.

It goes further.    It now emerges that the DMGT, the company that owns both the Mail and the Mail on Sunday, is controlled by a financial vehicle called Rothermere Continuation Ltd and incorporated in Bermuda and administered in Jersey.   The Mail should tell us how much tax they’re failing to pay to the British Treasury as a result of these tax have arrangements. Indeed the law should be changed to disqualify any newspaper that is not based in Britain and does not pay its full tax liability to the British Exchequer.   But what is stunning is that Dacre has regularly railed at tax havens as a ‘scourge’ that “costs Britain billions”.   So even apart from his amoral attitude to public behaviour, how can a hypocrite like that maintain his posture as defender of Middle England?