Showing posts with label pensioners. Show all posts
Showing posts with label pensioners. Show all posts

Saturday, August 31, 2013

TUC uncovers £67,000 pensions postcode lottery


A woman in her late 40s from East Dorset can expect to receive £67,000 more in state pension when she retires, compared to a women of the same age living in Corby, due to a widening gap in life expectancies and a rising state pension age, according to a new report published today by the TUC.


The report looks at life expectancy projections by gender, occupation and geographical area, and their effect on the amount of state pension people are set to receive. The state pension age is due to rise to 66 between 2018 and 2020 and to 67 between 2026 and 2028.

The research shows that by 2028 a woman living in East Dorset – the area of the UK with the longest post-65 life expectancy for both men and women – can expect to live nine years longer than a woman in Corby (the area with the shortest life expectancy) when they retire. This state pension divide works out at £67,000 over their lifetime. The state pension divide for men living in East Dorset and Manchester (the area with the shortest male post-65 life expectancy) will be £53,000.

This state pension divide will also grow for different types of workers. A female managerial or professional worker retiring in 2028 can expect to live 3.8 years longer than a female manual worker, compared to 2.4 years today. This state pension divide works out at £29,000. The equivalent gap for male manual and professional workers is £23,000, or 3.1 years.

The TUC report also shows that millions of people will receive less state pension, despite having to work for a further two years, because their life expectancy is not keeping pace with the increasing state pension age. People living in poor areas such as Corby, Manchester, Salford and Hull will receive substantially less state pension over their lifetime. A woman in her late 40s in Corby will have to work for two more years before retiring but will receive £12,000 less state pension during her retirement than those retiring in 2016.  A man of a similar age living in Manchester will receive £7,500 less during his retirement.

The lifetime state pension for men, based on a full ‘single-tier’ state pension award, will fall from £147,000 in 2016 (when the single-tier is introduced) to £146,000 in 2028. Women retiring in 2028 will have to work longer in order to receive the same state pension (£164,000) as those retiring in 2016.

The government’s failure to consider persistent inequalities in life expectancy when accelerating the rise in the state pension age, will leave millions far worse off in retirement, says the TUC.

The TUC believes that the government should reverse its decision to raise the state pension age in light of new evidence on life expectancy projections, and instead set up an independent commission to examine inequalities in life expectancy and their effect on people’s retirement incomes.

TUC general secretary Frances O’Grady said: “The government’s decision to accelerate the rise in the state pension age will mean millions of people having to work for longer in order to receive less in retirement.

“There is already a shocking divide in life expectancies across England, and if current trends continue that inequality will get worse in the coming decades. The government’s pension reforms will add to the problem, with people in richer areas receiving more from the state, while those in poorer areas receive less.

“It cannot be right that people living in a wealthy area can receive tens of thousands of pounds more in state pension than someone living in a less well off part of the country, particularly as richer people are likely to have earned more during the career and have a bigger private pension too.

“The government should abandon its plan to raise the state pension age in light of the new evidence on projected life expectancies. It should instead set up an independent commission to examine health inequalities and the impact on people’s expected retirement incomes.”

Source

Friday, March 8, 2013

Cameron's Bullingdon Club 'burn £50 notes in front of beggars'

Bullingdon Club initiation ceremony claim: New members of David Cameron's old club 'burn £50 note in front of beggar'


 

 

A friend of one of the exclusive club’s super-wealthy members revealed the sick prank to an Oxford student newspaper


 
Ex-member: David Cameron
Ex-member: David Cameron


New members of David Cameron’s old Bullingdon Club have to burn a £50 note in front of a beggar as part of an “initiation ceremony”, it has been claimed.

A friend of one of the exclusive club’s super-wealthy members revealed the sick prank to an Oxford student newspaper.

It was immediately condemned last night by Labour MP Ian Mearns.

He said: “This kind of thing takes us back to the loads-of-money days under the last Tory government.

“Then it wasn’t just about having cash – you had to rub it in the faces of those who didn’t. It’s distasteful and disgusting.”

The Bullingdon revelations came as figures showed a rise in those sleeping rough.

One night in autumn last year councils found 2,309 out on the streets compared to 2,181 in 2011.

The boozy Bullingdon club is infamous for trashing Oxford restaurants and its other former members include Chancellor George Osborne and London Mayor Boris Johnson.

Earlier this month a Bullingdon member is alleged to have set off fireworks in a club.

MIRROR

Tuesday, February 19, 2013

Bedroom Tax really is David Cameron's Poll Tax moment


An ICM poll in May 1990 showed that 22% of voters backed the Poll Tax (here). This weekend, a poll from ComRes showed that 28% of voters want David Cameron to push on with the Bedroom Tax (here). It is also worth noting that Tory strength in the opinion polls was 32% in mid 1990, and is in and around the same figure today. 

Those most opposed to the Bedroom Tax are Scottish voters, and voters from the North of England. This echoes the Poll Tax period that saw Scotland lead the resistance. Voters most opposed the Bedroom Tax are Plaid Cymru voters, SNP voters and Labour Party voters in that order. But it is worth noting that not even a majority of Tory voters want Cameron to push ahead with the Bedroom Tax. More than 80% of Tory voters think it is wrong that households that have soldiers fighting for their country in Afghanistan should be lumbered with the £1,300 tax. 

There are some differences between the two periods needless to say. Opinion was more firmly set against the Poll Tax with a lower percentage of "don't knows". The unfairness of the Poll Tax was felt by many more people than will lose out under the Bedroom Tax. For the Bedroom Tax protests to remain containable, David Cameron will be hoping that those unaffected by the Bedroom Tax, stand by the sidelines while their neighbour suffers. If ever there was a time that the Tory Party desperately needed the saying "There is no such thing as society" to be true, then that time is surely now.

We in Labour Left will be holding more than 30 Bedroom Tax Protests nationwide on the 16 March. Further demonstrations are earmarked for the 30 March by the Anti-Bedroom Tax campaign. We are calling on David Cameron to delay this Bedroom Tax by at least 1 year, so that its impact on the disabled, single parents, non-resident parents, pensioners, soldiers and carers can be properly thought through. 

The Green Benches