Reblogged
from Vox Political:
Apologies
are due to readers for the fact that new articles have been few and far between
this week; Vox Political creator Mike Sivier has been occupied with other
concerns including work at the Citizens Advice Bureau and campaigning to be a
Labour candidate in the 2015 election. Normal service will resume (hopefully) on
Monday.
In the meantime, here’s some information from a VP reader (who very
kindly asked not to be credited) on some of our favourite private companies with
entire fists – never mind fingers – in the public sector pie.
With around half of all public sector spending now paid to private
companies, lets look at some facts about the four largest recipients – Serco,
Capita, Atos and G4S.
In total, they have received more than £4 billion of taxpayers’ money in the
past year, making a cumulative profit of £1.05 billion. This means that, if the
work had been carried out within the public sector, the taxpayer would have
saved more than a quarter of the money used. That’s a lot of
money!
With Corporation Tax currently standing at 23 per cent, let’s look at how
much tax they paid: £75 million (around 7.5 per cent).
But the situation is actually worse than that! This is only the tax paid by
Capita and Serco.
Atos and G4S paid no tax at all.
Furthermore, none of these companies has successfully delivered the public
services they were contracted to carry out, despite having been paid anyway. Did
G4S successfully manage security at the 2012 Olympics, or was that the British
Army? Did Capita provide adequate court translation services? Has Atos carried
out work capability assessments for Employment and Support Allowance in a
professional and unproblematic manner? What about Serco and out-of-hours GP
services?
These firms have been content to take taxpayers’ money but avoid paying tax
on it, and then provided botched services. Two of them – Serco and G4S – are
currently under investigation by the Serious Fraud Office for overcharging on
electronic tagging of offenders.
It seems we were paying for these companies to monitor 3,000 phantom
offenders. They were charging for 18,000 while only 15,000 were being
monitored.
Coalition Justice Secretary and part-time clown Chris Grayling told MPs in
July that an external audit had revealed the overcharging, which included bills
for tracking the movements of criminals who had moved abroad, who were back in
prison, who had had their tags removed and even, in a few cases, those who had
died.
Even so – and despite sanctions against the companies as a result, the
scenario presented in the image (above) is still possible, thanks to the
Coalition government.
Outsourcing – a good deal for taxpayers? You decide…
(Source: http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2013/nov/12/public-sector-paid-outsourcing-firms-4-billion-pounds)
