Reblogged
from Vox Political:
Before you all hit the ‘comment’ button to say the headline is
stating the blindingly obvious – of course it is. But some of our public
servants just don’t seem to get it!
Today we have learned about the
first eviction directly caused by the bedroom tax making it impossible for a
person to pay their rent.
Mother-of-two Lorraine Fraser, who has scoliosis, arthritis and is a
wheelchair user, is being kicked out of her home by Labour-run North Lanarkshire
Council, for failing to pay £248 in arrears.
The event will be considered a double victory by the Department for Work and
Pensions. The eviction will be blamed on a council run by an opposing political
party, even though it is being forced to push through changes imposed on it by
the Conservative-led Westminster government (the majority of people will
not see this). And it will remove another disabled person from the
benefit books in a way that will not be blamed on the DWP (even though
disabled people were supposed to be protected against the effects of the bedroom
tax).
This is the sort of dishonesty that will go down in history as the
Coalition government’s trademark.
It may also be the reason why grassroots
members of the Liberal Democrats have tabled a motion to go before their party’s
conference, demanding a review of the policy.
The motion states that most areas outside large cities do not have the
diversity of social housing necessary to make moving into a smaller property,
locally, a viable option. In the words of Lib Dem councillor Robert Brown, it is
“damaging and unfair”.
It is.
It was always meant to be.
And it’s a little late for Liberal Democrats to be reconsidering their part
in making it happen.
However, there are constructive arguments to be made. For example, the
government has always said the aim is to get the housing benefit bill down. If
that’s the case, then it should be encouraging people to get off it – and
the best possibility for that lies with working people.
Indeed, government policy is to encourage working people to seek more hours
of work, or higher pay, at every opportunity – and if they achieved these aims,
it would be possible to wipe huge amounts of spending off the housing benefit
bill.
But that isn’t happening. Instead, we have an environment in which top bosses
pillage their companies, taking home 133 times as much as the average wage while
their workers have to supplement the pittances they earn with taxpayer-funded
benefits.
That isn’t right.
After all, the economy is said to be improving and – while that has nothing
at all to do with any efforts of the Coalition government; George Osborne is a
fool – every working person should benefit from the increased wealth that we are
told is now available.
Perhaps it’s time to ask comedy prime minister David Cameron when he’s going
to ‘encourage’ (he likes that word) business bosses to pass the
benefits of their success down the line.
When Hell freezes over, perhaps?