Reblogged from Vox Political:
Yesterday’s article, DWP
denials: They would kill you and call it ‘help’ received an
unprecedented reaction - considering it was only intended to prepare the way for
a larger discussion.
In less than 12 hours the article went viral and galvanised many of you into
vocal support, sharing your stories of government (and particularly DWP)
ill-treatment and urging others to follow this blog – for which much gratitude
is in order. Thanks to all concerned.
The aim was to show how low politics and politicians have fallen in public
estimation. The general consensus is that our politicians aren’t
interested in us. They make promise after promise before elections –
and the party (or parties) in office often set up tax breaks for sections of
society their focus groups have told them are needed to secure a win.
After they’ve got what they want, they don’t give a damn.
Look at the Coalition. The consensus is that this is a failed government.
That it has broken one promise after another. That its ministers are liars and
its Prime Minister is the worst charlatan of the lot.
That its rallying-call, “We’re all in it together”, refers only to
Conservative and Liberal Democrat Members of Parliament and their close friends
in the most lucrative (and therefore richest) industries, along with the bankers
(of course), and that they have all dug their noses deep into the trough and are
(to mix metaphors) sucking us dry. Look at the way Mark Hoban employed his
former employers to rubber-stamp the DWP’s new plans for the Work Capability
Assessment.
In short: That the Coalition government is the most incompetent and
corrupt administration to blight the United Kingdom in living memory,
and possibly the worst that this land has ever endured.
We fear that these tin-pot tyrants are carrying out a eugenics programme to
kill off people who have become sick or disabled; we fear that their economic
policies are designed to put anyone less than upper-middle-class into the kind
of debt that current wages will never permit them to pay off – a debt that can
then be sold between fat-cat corporations who will hold the masses in actual –
if not admitted – slavery; that they will dismantle this country’s institutions,
handing over everything that is worth anything to their buddies in business, who
will make us pay through the nose for services that our taxes ought to
cover.
And yet a
recent poll suggests that we would prefer this corrupt gang of
asset-stripping bandits to run the economy of the country (into the ground)
rather than give Her Majesty’s Opposition, the Labour Party, an opportunity to
restore the country’s fortunes.
Are we all going schizoid? Are we really saying that, while we don’t believe
the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats could organise a binge in a brewery
without stealing the booze from us while we’re drinking it,
we do believe them when they say the current economic nightmare
was because Labour mismanaged the economy?
(In case anyone hasn’t really thought it through, the current lie is
that the international credit crunch that has cost the world trillions of pounds
was caused, not by bankers (who have never been punished for it)
but by the UK Labour Party giving too much money away to scrounging
benefit cheats. In fact, only 0.7 per cent of benefit claims are
fraudulent and, while they cost the taxpayer £1.2 billion a year, that does not
justify the £19 billion the Coalition has given to its private, for-profit
friends to make a pretence of dealing with it.)
Are we really saying that even though we all now know that George Osborne’s
economic policy is nonsense, based on a theory that has been comprehensively
rubbished, we’re all happy to give him and his miserable boss David Cameron the
credit for the slight improvement in the UK’s economic fortunes that we have
seen in recent months? It was always going to improve at some
point, and the current upturn is more likely to be part of that kind of cycle
than anything Osborne has done.
If we really are saying that, then we all need to put in claims for
Employment and Support Allowance, on grounds of mental instability!
That’s not what’s going on, though.
It seems far more likely that the general public is having a crisis
of confidence. As a nation, we know what we’ve got is bad; we just
don’t have confidence that we’ll get better if we put our support behind the
Opposition.
This is the Coalition’s one great success: It has damaged the
reputation of politics and politicians so badly that nobody involved in that
occupation can escape being labelled as corrupt, or liars, or
worse.
And Labour is doing far too little to fight that.
A BBC article on the
problems facing Labour states that the Coalition has sharpened up its
messages on, among other things, welfare and immigration. The message is still
the usual hogwash; the problem is that Labour has made no meaningful response.
Her Majesty’s Opposition appears to have given up Opposing.
Is this because the main political parties are now so similar that Labour is
now supporting Coalition policies? That would make sense in the
context of statements made before the summer recess by Ed Miliband and Ed Balls,
in which Labour appeared to capitulate over welfare and the economy, even though
the Coalition had lost all the major arguments.
When they did that damned stupid thing in that damned stupid way, Vox
Political was the first to say “watch their poll lead disappear” – and it
has more than halved from 11 percentage points to five, according
to The Guardian.
This lackadaisical attitude from the Labour leadership has not gone unnoticed
among the backbenchers and the grass roots, and the last few weeks has been
notable for the rising chorus of dissent against Ed Miliband’s leadership.
Some have described the Labour front bench as “Plastic
Tories”.
Even Shadow Health Secretary Andy Burnham took a pop, saying Labour needed to
“shout louder” and produce attention-grabbing policies by next spring – or lose
any chance of winning the 2015 election.
Miliband’s response to that was to claim that Burnham was really saying the
Labour Party was “setting out how we would change the country”. This is
nonsense. He was saying that was what Labour needed to
do, and Miliband rendered himself untrustworthy by suggesting
otherwise.
It is very hard to put your support – and your vote – behind somebody you
don’t trust, who seems completely unable (or unwilling) to fight your oppressor
on your behalf; in short, someone who seems just as corrupt as the government in
power. At the moment, Ed Miliband doesn’t stand for anything – so there’s no
reason you should stand up for him.
What, then, should Labour do?
Easy. The party needs a clear, simple message that everybody can
understand and get behind; one that members can support because it reflects
Labour beliefs rather than whatever Coalition policy currently seems popular,
and above all, one that comes from verifiable truth.
He could take a leaf from Paul O’Grady’s book. In a clip on YouTube, the
entertainer says: “We should be vocal in our fight against oppression. We should
let them know that we are not taking these draconian cuts lightly!
“We should fight for the rights of the elderly! Of the poor! Of the sick! And
of the children!”
Rapturous applause.
Labour needs more than that – but a commitment to protect those who
have been most harmed by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat doomsday spree
would at least be a start.