Monday, August 5, 2013
IDS: Benefits Fantasies
This clash of real facts and bizarre decisions reaches an embarrassing nadir whenever Iain Duncan Smith tries to justify cuts to welfare. Confronted by evidence, IDS keeps hitting back with his opinion. He “believes” that there is plenty of affordable housing in London, he says. He “believes” that benefit caps cause jobs to exist. He probably believes that the scent of a Mr Whippy enrages sharks.
All the evidence compiled by statisticians in his own department says he is wrong about benefit caps, and the facts reported by The Independent last week show that he’s wrong about the “bedroom tax” too, but Mr Duncan Smith sticks rigidly to his beliefs. The problem is, belief doesn’t make employment and housing exist any more than it stops a fairy dying, and it’s about time the Government grew up and learnt to tell evidence from utter baloney.
A recent survey showed that public opinion is almost as out of kilter with the facts as IDS is. Among the examples: the public think that £24 of every £100 of benefits is fraudulently claimed. The real figure is 70p in every £100. Then, 29 per cent of people think that more is spent on Job Seekers’ Allowance than on pensions. In fact, pensions cost 15 times more.
My hypothesis is that persuading the public to hold false beliefs enables governments to get away with cruelly targeting the poor. My conclusion is that we should feed IDS an enormous ice cream and tell him to go and play near deep water.
by Katy Guest in ‘The Independent’