With hardening attitudes towards people on benefits and a tougher welfare regime, thank goodness for organisations like The Cyrenians, says Abigail Scott Paul.
Empathy is the central value at homeless charity The Cyrenians. 
And, without doubt, in the two days I have been here in Newcastle, I have 
witnessed first-hand just how compassionate their front-line workers are: each 
support worker, manager, receptionist or volunteer goes above and beyond to help 
the person who walks through the door. No job, however menial, annoying or 
petty, is too small. This individual and caring approach could not be thrown 
into more stark relief by the reality of navigating today’s welfare system.
The Cyrenians work with some of the most vulnerable 
people in society: homeless drug addicts, alcoholics, ex-offenders and people 
with severe mental health issues. Benefits are a lifeline. Without them they 
have absolutely nothing: no bed, no food and no prospect of moving forward. Yet 
the system, often described as a ‘safety net’, is complex, difficult and 
impractical to access and navigate for people with chaotic lives.
I saw numerous people telephoning call centres to 
find out if the money they had been expecting was in their bank accounts. Every 
time they call, they get a different person in a different call centre. And what 
about those who can’t read or write? Low literacy and numeracy skills are 
common. Or, what happens if people simply do not have the bus fare to go to the 
Job Centre? It’s at these points of crisis that The Cyrenians step in to 
help.
But there is one major new development that looms 
large over many people: sanctions. 
Help can now be withdrawn immediately if people do not comply with the 
conditions of their benefits. This week I have heard numerous stories about 
sanctions, but these stuck in my mind:
- A woman in her sixties had her benefits stopped because she only looked for 10 jobs in a week, rather than the required 15.
- A man had his benefits stopped for not attending an appointment at the Job Centre, because he was working in his job on the Work Programme (set up by the Job Centre).
As part of reforming welfare, sanctions have been put 
in place to encourage people get back into work. Yet these cases highlight how a 
breakdown in communication between the claimant and Job Centre Plus can lead to 
benefits being withdrawn. Clearly, more work needs to be done to improve 
communication about conditionality.
On the front line, it’s 
hard to see how such strict regimes and complicated access will help those who 
need it most. There is still very little evidence on the long-term impacts of 
sanctions and research shows that the imposition of 
sanctions can result in criminal behaviour. Certainly support workers are 
predicting a rise in crime as people are left with no other option to get what 
they need.
Against a backdrop of hardening attitudes towards people on benefits 
and a tougher welfare regime, there appears to be little empathy left for the 
most vulnerable in society. Thank goodness for organisations like The 
Cyrenians.
by Abigil Scott Paul at the Joseph Rowntree 
Foundation, 7th August 2013: http://www.jrf.org.uk/blog/2013/08/sanctions-welfare-poverty
